|
U.S. initial damage report: Iran nuclear program set back by months, not obliterated The Washington PostExclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say CNNStrike Set Back Iran's Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S. Report Says The New York TimesThe Pillars of Iran's Regime Are Damaged, Not Destroyed WSJ
|
|
Maxar Technologies images showed major damage at Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites after U.S. B-2 bombers launched precision strikes over the weekend.
|
RELATED ARTICLES | | |
|
Trump plans to tout Iran strikes at NATO summit focused on European defense spending PoliticoIn his sole full day at the NATO summit, Trump faces an alliance further shaped to his liking AP NewsDonald Trump's wavering on Nato defence pact casts pall over summit Financial TimesTrump heads to NATO summit as Europe agrees to heed his defense spending demands Fox News
|
|
Trump Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff discusses the effectiveness of U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities after a leaked intelligence assessment questioned the results.
|
|
This is what could happen next after an Israel-Iran ceasefire AP NewsThe Problem With Trump's Cease-Fire The AtlanticTrump's Celebrating an Iran Ceasefire. There's a Bigger Danger Lurking. Slate MagazineWhat's next for Iran's regime after U.S. strikes and Israel ceasefire? Analysts weigh in PBS
|
|
ICE arrests four additional Iranian nationals with criminal histories amid concerns about sleeper cells following strikes on Iran's nuclear sites
|
|
