|
Two massive data breaches in 2019 and 2024 exposed millions of customers' personal information.
|
|
 Apple will unveil its new iPhone 17 lineup on September 9 in a range of new colors. Below, we've collated all the rumored colors for the regular iPhone 17, the all-new ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air, the ?iPhone 17 Pro?, and the larger ?iPhone 17? Pro Max.
|
|
 Apple's iOS 26 update brings an unexpected camera trick to AirPods 4 and AirPods Pro 2 - the ability to control iPhone photo and video capture using AirPods stem gestures. The new Camera Remote feature essentially turns your wireless earbuds into a handy hands-free photography tool. Keep reading to learn how it works.
|
|
Data retention has also been extended to five years under the updated policy. Here's how to opt out.
|
|
Here's how Apple's iPhone 17 lineup will differ when they launch on Sept. 9 -- at least according to the rumors we've heard.
|
|
According to a post on the official YouTube blog, Fox News, Fox Business, and Fox Sports will all go dark on YouTube TV if Fox and YouTube owner Google can't resolve their differences by 5 p.m. ET on Wednesday August 27—tomorrow.
On a website presenting its own side of the dispute, Fox adds a few more channels that may fade out on YouTube TV, including FS1, FS2, Big Ten Network, Fox Desportes, the Fox News Channel, and local Fox channels, which carry (among other shows) Sunday NFL matchups.
The short version of the dustup is that Fox and YouTube TV can't agree on the terms of an upcoming carriage renewal, with each side accusing the other of being greedy, stingy, a bully, or some mixture therein.
For its part, YouTube claims that Fox is "asking for payments that are far higher than what partners with comparable content offerings receive," while adding that YouTube wants to "reach a deal that reflects the value of their content and is fair for both sides without passing on additional costs to our subscribers." So yes, YouTube is raising the specter of price increases if Fox gets it way.
On the flip side, Fox says it's "proposing a fair, comprehensive deal" while accusing Google of "continually exploit[ing] its outsized influence by proposing terms that are out of step with the marketplace."
It's bellicose language, all right, but
|
|
