|
As Iranian missiles strike military, residential and economic targets in neighboring Gulf states, we speak to Al Jazeera's senior political analyst Marwan Bishara in Doha, Qatar. Bishara says Iran's targeting of U.S. allies in the region may be an Iranian calculation that there is "a cost to be paid for American interests" as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other regional powers are forced to respond to an "Israeli war of choice." Meanwhile, says Bishara, the U.S. has learned "nothing" from its own history. Not only has the Trump administration "repeated every single false pretext the Bush administration carried or diffused to justify the war against Iraq," but "this threatens to be a far worse war in its implication for American long-term security and for the stability in the region … It's like the American government [is] addicted to international violence, to wars, to assassinations, to launching those hegemonic wars that they [cannot] end."
|
|
The administration has no control over the disciplinary authorities of state bar associations, but a new proposal would let the attorney general ask them to suspend proceedings involving department lawyers.
|
|
The administration's shifting justifications for the military operation alarmed Democrats, who said no clear rationale had been given. Republicans struggled to echo the evolving explanations.
|
|
We speak with economist Michael Hudson, who details how President Trump opted to attack Iran despite progress at indirect U.S.-Iran negotiations. "The whole reason that America has attacked Iran has nothing to do with its getting an atom bomb," but instead the aim was U.S. control of oil, says Hudson. The Trump administration may have been after the ability to "turn off the power" to countries that don't follow U.S. foreign policy, he says.
|
|
