CEOExpress Blogger Private Label
 CEOExpress Home

 Total visits to this poll: 19174

This icon appears on your homepage
when there are new posts.

      Search Messages:           
AllThis Forum

What is your opinion of the electoral college?

It is an outdated system and should be elliminated--popular vote should rule
It plays an important role in balancing power of the states
I have a different plan

Forum View Preference: Basic | AdvancedOpen Forums/Previous Polls | Suggest a Poll
Return to Today's Poll

Sort By Newest Sort By Newest 1-10 of 1471 11-20 >>  Last >

1. Patricia Pomerleau CEOExpressSelect Member
     Forum Moderator
     (11/21/2016 7:51:55 AM)
     Message ID #273701

View All Related Messages

Recently, elections have been won in the electoral college, but lost in the popular vote. Depending on which side wins, the electoral college is either a bane or a great construct. Once again a national discussion of the merits and deficits of the electoral college has come to the fore.

Arguments for the Electoral College

  • Certainty of Results
  • Discourages 3rd Parties
  • Precludes Possibility of National Re-Count of Votes
  • Keeps States as Integral Part of Presidential Selection
  • Keeps Small States as Viable Participants
  • Establishes Campaign Need to Build "Concurrent Majorities"
  • Provides Chosen Candidate with a Majority

Arguments Against the Electoral College

  • Can Distort the Popular Choice
  • Discourages 3rd Parties
  • Disenfranchises Voters in States Which Support Electoral College Loser
  • Allows for the "Faithless Elector"
  • Can Allow Presidential Election to be Decided by the House of Representatives Where Each States Has One Vote
  • It Is Archaic - Based on Political Considerations No Longer Relevant

Two states apportion electoral votes based on the popular vote--a construct that could create a more balanced election if all states changed their rules from "winner takes all"

There are strong arguments on both sides of this issue. What is your view of the electoral college?

Editor's Note:
Comments Policy — We welcome comments, posts, and informed debate from a wide range of perspectives. Personal attacks, insulting/ vulgar posts, or repetitious/ false tirades have no place and can result in moderation or banning.
Civility — Clear-minded criticism is welcome, but play the ball and not the person. This includes speculation about motives or what ‘sort of person’ someone is. Civility, gentle humor, and staying on topic are superior debating tools.
Relevance — Please maintain focus on the topic at hand. Do not attempt to solve big problems in a single comment or to offer as fact what simply are opinions.
Ponder before you post — Whether you intend to or not, it’s bad form to dominate a discussion.

2. Jeffrey Boire CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 8:10:44 AM)
     Message ID #273702

View All Related Messages
I prefer large population states to submit to the EC and that more population is no guarantee of unreasonable control.

3. Robert Fahrbach CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 8:23:45 AM)
     Message ID #273703

View All Related Messages
Without the electoral college, Americans living on 80% of Americas land area with be entirely misrepresented.

Since the vast majority of America's productive citizens live outside the cities... the nation would not survive without it.

4. D Robb
     (11/21/2016 8:44:42 AM)
     Message ID #273704

This message is in response to Patricia Pomerleau ( message id #273701 )  View All Related Messages

I have written before on this forum that while I admire our Founding Fathers I think they made a terrible mistake creating a King President. The parliamentary system where voters vote for the party they believe best represents their goals and vision is, in my opinion, a much better system.
I would further advocate that Representatives be elected by the total popular vote from a state rather than from Gerrymandered districts. If a state is entitled to 10 representatives the seats would be allocated to the top ten candidates based on the votes they received.
I reject the defense of the electoral college that supports it because without it the States with the largest populations would dominate those that have more cows than people. One person, one vote.

5. Domenick Aulozzi CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 9:08:06 AM)
     Message ID #273705

This message is in response to Patricia Pomerleau ( message id #273701 )  View All Related Messages

The electoral college has been miss-characterized as somehow unfair because people deliberately talk about the popular vote of the county as a whole as if that means anything.

We are the "United States" of America. We select our national president by states, not as a whole, so the national popular vote is irrelevant and to use it for a point of argument deliberately confuses the issue.

Without the electoral college the election would be unfairly decided by those states with the largest populations; leaving the smaller states powerless and disenfranchised from the process.

Apportioning electors by percentage does the same thing at a state level. It unfairly subjects the rural populations to the massive urban populations.

Although Wisconsin does not apportion electors in this manner, Wisconsin election laws are a good example of how rural populations are disenfranchised by large urban areas with early voting.

Milwaukee and Madison (heavily democrat) can afford to keep their polling places open longer and at odd times so their voters have better access to polls and voting that the rest of the state does not have access to. Somehow this is considered fair. The results of apportioning electors by popular vote would have the same result. Giving extra weight to the urban population areas that have a greater access to vote and higher percentage of voters.

Message edited by user at 11/21/2016 9:09:05 AM

6. Gary Patishnock CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 9:14:39 AM)
     Message ID #273706

View All Related Messages
Perhaps the "tweak" is to have two at-large Electors plus one Elector voting by Congressional district outcome. Might make the gerrymandering all the more interesting...

7. Robert Fahrbach CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 9:26:26 AM)
     Message ID #273707

This message is in response to D Robb ( message id #273704 )  View All Related Messages

I agree. We need to stand up for the voting rights of our Cow-American friends.

Message edited by user at 11/21/2016 9:29:23 AM

8. GAN BN CEOExpressSelect Member
     (11/21/2016 9:38:06 AM)
     Message ID #273708

View All Related Messages
The progressive liberals are clearly what's wrong with our country.

Nothing says “democracy” like threatening to murder people for democratically-electing a President.

Threats of murder are real for some of the Electors.

9. Patricia Pomerleau CEOExpressSelect Member
     Forum Moderator
     (11/21/2016 9:45:13 AM)
     Message ID #273709

This message is in response to GAN BN ( message id #273708 )  View All Related Messages

Nice source. speaks volumes.

check out your boy. I can see why you quoted him. LOL.

Nothing says democracy like a Nazi alt-right source.

10. TCB Nough
     (11/21/2016 9:51:17 AM)
     Message ID #273710

View All Related Messages
It is proven the Framers were right. The Electoral College assures that concentrated population centers do not unduly or unfairly influence our way of governing. The Federalism described in the founding documents is protected in this way. We have a Republic, not a popular democracy. These elections are 50 individual statewide races, not a national popularity contest.
  1-10 of 1471 11-20 >>  Last >